Login | Register
Kazakh National Agrarian Research University ISSN 2304-3334 (Print)  ·  ISSN 2304-3334 (Online)
submit an article
Menu
submit an article
AGRICULTURE, AGROCHEMICAL, FEED PRODUCTION, AGROECOLOGY

EFFICIENCY OF SEED TREATMENT WITH THE FUNGICIDE TЕBU-NAZOL, 25% k.s.ON SPRING WHEAT

R. Akylbekova* 1 , А. Zhunussova 1 , М. Kanatova 1 , М. Alimkulova 1

1 Kazakh National Agrarian Research University, Almaty, Kazakhstan

doi.org/10.37884/2-2022/06 pp. 46-55 Admitted 23.06.2022 Published 28.06.2022

Abstract

Minimization of tillage without proper control of pathogens and pests, sowing of cereals according to grain precursors without taking into account the quality of seed material and varietal characteristics, the absence of crop rotations contribute to the increased infestation of grain crops with diseases, especially root rot, which can cause losses of 30% of the crop.

The article presents the results of seed treatment of spring wheat with the Tebu-Nazol fungicide, 25% s.c. (tebuconazole, 250 g/l), which was not used previously. Fungicide which is undergoing registration test Tebu-Nazol, 25% s.c. showed high efficiency in the combat against smut diseases, root rot and mold when treating spring wheat seeds before sowing. When conducting laboratory studies, the germination rate of control seeds was 90.5%, whereas in the experiment (Tebu-Nasol, 25% k.s. - 0.1 l/t) this index was 94.9%; seed mold in the experimental variety was 1.1%, in the standard (Folmex, t.k.s-0.1 l/t) - 1.2%, while in the control, where no seed treatment was carried out, it was 6.1% respectively. As a result of pre-sowing treatment in field experiments, the yield increases with using of the Tebu-Nazol protectant, 25% s.c. (0,1 l/t) in comparison with the control was 3.5 c/ha, and in the standard (Folmex, t.k.s – 0,1 l/t)  was 2.9 c/hectare.

wheat, fungicide, Tеbu-Nazol, loose smut, hard smut, root rot, seed mold, efficiency, yield

01 Introduction

The full text of the article is available for download in PDF format on the right panel.

02 References

  1. 1. Азизи Мохаммад Икрам, Сарбаев А.Т., Дутбаев Е.Б. Эффективность применения фунгицида Фоликур ВТ 22,5 к.э. в посевах озимой пшеницы. Ж. Исследования, результаты. 2017 - № 2 (74), С. 124-127.
  2. 2. Койшибаев М. Протравливание семян - важное профилактическое мероприятие. Защита и карантин растений, - 2008 - № 2, С. 33-35.
  3. 3. Барысбеков А., Сырлыбаев Г. Влияние предпосевной лазерной обработки семян на продуктивность и качество зерна яровой пшеницы сорта Астана-2. Исследования, результаты. 2017 - № 4 (76, С. 257-226.
  4. 4. Хазиев А.З., Зайцев Т.В.Ю., Хакимуллина Ф.М. Роль протравливания семян в борьбе с корневыми гнилями. Защита и карантин растений, - 2015 - № 3, С. 20-23.
  5. 5. Каримова Л.З., Сафин Р.И., Таланов И.В. Влияние предпосевной обработки семян и нормы высева на формирование урожая и пораженность растений ячменя корневыми гнилями. Вестник Ульяновской государственной сельскохозяйственной академии, 2015 - № 1 (29), С.21-25.
  6. 6. Разина А.А., Дятлова О.Г. Влияние агрофона и протравливания семян яровой пшеницы на снижение вредоносности корневой гнили. Сибирский вестник сельскохозяйственной науки. 2015, № 5, С.19-24.
  7. 7. Интернет ресурс URL: https://www.agroinvestor.ru/technologies/article/15126-v-borbe-za-semena/
  8. 8. Методические указания по проведению регистрационных испытаний фунгицидов, протравителей семян и биопрепаратов в растениеводстве. Под редакцией Р. Касымханова. Алматы-Акмола, 1997. – 64 с.
  9. 9. Правила проведения регистрационных, производственных испытаний и государственной регистрации пестицидов (ядохимикатов) в Республике Казахстан. - Астана, 2015.- 32 c.
  10. 10. Доспехов, Б. А. Методика полевого опыта (с основами статистической обработки результатов исследований). // Б.А. Доспехов. — 5-е изд., доп. и перераб.—М.: Агропромиздат, 1985. — 351 с, ил.

Citation Links

[1]2022. EFFICIENCY OF SEED TREATMENT WITH THE FUNGICIDE TЕBU-NAZOL, 25% k.s.ON SPRING WHEAT. Izdenister natigeler. 2 (94) (Jun. 2022), 46–55. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37884/2-2022/06.
(1)EFFICIENCY OF SEED TREATMENT WITH THE FUNGICIDE TЕBU-NAZOL, 25% k.S.ON SPRING WHEAT. Izdenister natigeler 2022, No. 2 (94), 46-55. https://doi.org/10.37884/2-2022/06.
EFFICIENCY OF SEED TREATMENT WITH THE FUNGICIDE TЕBU-NAZOL, 25% k.s.ON SPRING WHEAT. (2022). Izdenister Natigeler, 2 (94), 46-55. https://doi.org/10.37884/2-2022/06
EFFICIENCY OF SEED TREATMENT WITH THE FUNGICIDE TЕBU-NAZOL, 25% k.s.ON SPRING WHEAT. Izdenister natigeler, [S. l.], n. 2 (94), p. 46–55, 2022. DOI: 10.37884/2-2022/06. Disponível em: https://kazvetjournal.kaznaru.edu.kz/index.php/research/article/view/126. Acesso em: 15 sep. 2026.
“EFFICIENCY OF SEED TREATMENT WITH THE FUNGICIDE TЕBU-NAZOL, 25% k.S.ON SPRING WHEAT”. 2022. Izdenister Natigeler, no. 2 (94) (June): 46-55. https://doi.org/10.37884/2-2022/06.
“EFFICIENCY OF SEED TREATMENT WITH THE FUNGICIDE TЕBU-NAZOL, 25% k.s.ON SPRING WHEAT” (2022) Izdenister natigeler, (2 (94), pp. 46–55. doi:10.37884/2-2022/06.
[1]“EFFICIENCY OF SEED TREATMENT WITH THE FUNGICIDE TЕBU-NAZOL, 25% k.s.ON SPRING WHEAT”, Izdenister natigeler, no. 2 (94), pp. 46–55, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.37884/2-2022/06.
“EFFICIENCY OF SEED TREATMENT WITH THE FUNGICIDE TЕBU-NAZOL, 25% k.S.ON SPRING WHEAT”. Izdenister Natigeler, no. 2 (94), June 2022, pp. 46-55, https://doi.org/10.37884/2-2022/06.
“EFFICIENCY OF SEED TREATMENT WITH THE FUNGICIDE TЕBU-NAZOL, 25% k.S.ON SPRING WHEAT”. Izdenister natigeler, no. 2 (94) (June 28, 2022): 46–55. Accessed September 15, 2026. https://kazvetjournal.kaznaru.edu.kz/index.php/research/article/view/126.
1.EFFICIENCY OF SEED TREATMENT WITH THE FUNGICIDE TЕBU-NAZOL, 25% k.s.ON SPRING WHEAT. Izdenister natigeler [Internet]. 2022 Jun. 28 [cited 2026 Sep. 15];(2 (94):46-55. Available from: https://kazvetjournal.kaznaru.edu.kz/index.php/research/article/view/126
1.EFFICIENCY OF SEED TREATMENT WITH THE FUNGICIDE TЕBU-NAZOL, 25% k.s.ON SPRING WHEAT. Izdenister natigeler. 2022;(2 (94):46-55. doi:10.37884/2-2022/06