Login | Register
Kazakh National Agrarian Research University ISSN 2304-3334 (Print)  ·  ISSN 2304-3334 (Online)
submit an article
Menu
submit an article
AGRICULTURE, AGROCHEMICAL, FEED PRODUCTION, AGROECOLOGY

GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MAPPING OF THE TERRITORY TALAS DISTRICT OF ZHAMBYL REGION

Roza Bekseitova 1 , Larisa Veselova 1 , Salavat Duisenbayev 1 , Omirzhan Taukebayev 1 , Aizhan Assylbekova 1 , Burghard C. Meyer 2 , Edil Sarybayev 1 , Nazym Zhenisova 1

1 Al-Farabi Kazakh National University; 2 Leipzig University

doi.org/10.37884/2-2024/11 pp. 108-122 Admitted 02.04.2024 Published 29.06.2024

Abstract

At the present stage of the development of civilization, the rational use of natural resources is one of the main directions for solving problems of human activity and life support. The study and management of geomorphological processes is a necessary link in the complex of rational use of natural resources. Relief-forming and relief-transforming processes significantly affect human economic activity, determining the direction and nature of this activity. In the arid conditions of the Talas district of Zhambyl region, the processes of weathering, deflation, denudation and accumulation have a significant impact on the use of land resources in agriculture. The study area is geographically represented in the south by low-mountain landscapes, turning to the north into loamy-gravelly desert landscapes; in the central part - floodplain and terrace complexes of the Talas valley; in the northern part - landscapes of the Moyinkum sandy massif; a small part is occupied by local closed depressions - sores and salt lakes.

The issues of methodology for compiling various types of geomorphological maps are considered, their analogues using digital mapping technology are developed. The classification of the relief of the studied territory is given and the legend of the geomorphological map is compiled with the allocation of such taxa relief class, genesis, types and subtypes of relief with the development of a system of their symbols. These maps, compiled on a digital basis, are the pioneer of the first large-scale geomorphological maps of the administrative regions of Kazakhstan.

map, relief, DEM, hypsometry, geomorphology, mapping, Talas district.

01 Introduction

The full text of the article is available for download in PDF format on the right panel.

02 References

  1. 1. Тунгатар Д., Кайпбаев Е., Муханбет Е., Исах С., Турсыналы Д. (2023). ОПРЕДЕЛЕНИЕ МОРФОМЕТРИЧЕСКИХ ХАРАКТЕРИСТИК РЕК С ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЕМ ГИС-ТЕХНОЛОГИЙ. Izdenister Natigeler, (1 (97), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.37884/1-2023/14
  2. 2. Н.В. Осинцева. АНАЛИТИЧЕСКОЕ ГЕОМОРФОЛОГИЧЕСКОЕ КАРТОГРАФИРОВАНИЕ. Уч.пособие. Томск, 2010
  3. 3. Bolongaro-Crevenna A, Torres-Rodríguez V, Sorani V, Frame D, Arturo M (2005) Geomorphometric analysis for characterizing landforms in Morelos State, Mexico. Geomorphology 67:407–422
  4. 4. Oldroyd DR, Grapes, RH (2008) Contributions to the history of geomorphology and Quaternary geology: an introduction:1–17
  5. 5. Kleman J, Borgström I, Skelton A, Hall A (2016) Landscape evolution and landform inheritance in tectonically active regions: the case of the Southwestern Peloponnese, Greece. Zeitschrift Für Geomorphologie 60:171–193
  6. 6. Castelltort S, Whittaker A, Vergés J (2015) Tectonics, sedimentation and surface processes: from the erosional engine to basin deposition. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 40:1839–1846
  7. 7. Zhang JY, Yin A, Liu WC, Ding L, Xu XM (2016) First geomorphological and sedimentological evidence for the combined tectonic and climate control on Quaternary Yarlung river diversion in the eastern Himalaya. Lithosphere 8: 293–316
  8. 8. Marshall JA, Roering JJ, Gavin DG, Granger DE (2017) Late Quaternary climatic controls on erosion rates and geomorphic processes in western Oregon, USA. GSA Bulletin 129:715–731
  9. 9. Szabó J, Dávid L, Lóczy D (2010) Anthropogenic geomorphology: a guide to man- made landforms. Springer Science & Business Media, Netherland
  10. 10. Hooke R (2012) Land transformation by humans: a review. GSA Today 22:4–10
  11. 11. Ellis EC, Fuller DQ, Kaplan JO, Lutters WG (2013) Dating the Anthropocene: towards an empirical global history of human transformation of the terrestrial biosphere. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 1, p.000018, doi: 10.12952/journal.elementa.000018
  12. 12. Goudie AS, Viles HA (2016) Geomorphology in the Anthropocene. Cambridge, UK
  13. 13. Tarolli P, Sofia G (2016) Human topographic signatures and derived geomorphic processes across landscapes. Geomorphology 255:140–161
  14. 14. Tarolli P (2016) Humans and the Earth's surface. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 41 (15):2301-2304
  15. 15. Brown AG, Tooth S, Bullard JE, Thomas D, Chiverrell RC, Plater AJ, Murton J, Thorndycraft VR, Tarolli P, Rose J, Wainwright J, Downs P, Aalto R (2017) The geomorphology of the Anthropocene: emergence, status and implications. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 42:71–90
  16. 16. Migoń P, Latocha A (2018) Human impact and geomorphic change through time in the Sudetes, Central Europe. Quaternary International 470:194–206
  17. 17. Goudie A (2018) The human impact in geomorphology – 50 years of change. Geomorphology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.12.002
  18. 18. Tarolli P, Cao W, Sofia G, Evans D, Ellis EC (2019) From features to fingerprints: a general diagnostic framework for anthropogenic geomorphology. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment 43:95–128
  19. 19. Tóth C (2010) Agriculture: grazing lands and other grasslands. In Anthropogenic Geomorphology (69–82). Springer
  20. 20. Curebal I, Efe R, Soykan A, Sonmez S (2015) Impacts of anthropogenic factors on land degradation during the anthropocene in Turkey. J Environ Biol 36:51
  21. 21. Borrelli P, Robinson DA, Fleischer LR, Lugato E, Ballabio C, Alewell C, Meusburger K, Modugno S, Schütt B, Ferro V, Bagarello V, Oost KV, Montanarella L,Panagos P (2017) An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion. Nature Communications 8 (1): 2013
  22. 22. Tessler ZD, Vörösmarty CJ, Grossberg M, Gladkova I, Aizenman H (2016) A global empirical typology of anthropogenic drivers of environmental change in deltas. Sustainability Science 11:525–537
  23. 23. Wang S, Fu BJ, Piao S, Lü Y, Ciais P, Feng X, Wang Y (2016) Reduced sediment transport in the Yellow River due to anthropogenic changes. Nat Geosci 9:38
  24. 24. Poeppl RE, Keesstra SD, Maroulis J (2017) A conceptual connectivity framework for understanding geomorphic change in human-impacted fluvial systems. Geomorphology 277:237–250
  25. 25. Csima P (2010) Urban development and anthropogenic geomorphology. In: Szabó J, Dávid L, Lóczy D (eds) Anthropogenic geomorphology. Springer, Dordrecht
  26. 26. Sidle RC, Ziegler AD (2012) The dilemma of mountain roads. Nature Geoscience 5 (7):437-438
  27. 27. Penna D, Borga M, Aronica GT, Brigandì G, Tarolli P (2014) The influence of grid resolution on the prediction of natural and road-related shallow landslides. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 18 (6):2127-2139
  28. 28. Ramos-Scharrón CE (2018) Land disturbance effects of roads in runoff and sediment production on dry-tropical settings. Geoderma 310:107-119
  29. 29. Хромых В.В., Хромых О.В. Цифровые модели рельефа: учебное пособие. – Томск, 2007.
  30. 30. Masato O., Takeshi M., Takahiro A., Hiroto N., Takeo T., Yukihiro K., Masanobu S., ”ALOS-2 mission status and updates,” Proceedings of IGARSS (International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium), Valencia, Spain, July 23-27, 2018].
  31. 31. Schlögel R. et al. Landslide deformation monitoring with ALOS/PALSAR imagery: A D-InSAR geomorphological interpretation method //Geomorphology. – 2015. – Т. 231. – С. 314-330.
  32. 32. Сагынбаева А., Джаманова Г., Байгазакова Ж., Тұрлыбеков Қ.. «МЕТОДИКА СОЗДАНИЯ ЛЕСНЫХ КАРТ С ПОМОЩЬЮ ГИС – ТЕХНОЛОГИЙ». Izdenister Natigeler, вып. 2 (98), июнь 2023 г., сс. 305-1, doi:10.37884/2-2023/30.

Citation Links

[1]2024. GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MAPPING OF THE TERRITORY TALAS DISTRICT OF ZHAMBYL REGION. Izdenister natigeler. 2 (102) (Jun. 2024), 108–122. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37884/2-2024/11.
(1)GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MAPPING OF THE TERRITORY TALAS DISTRICT OF ZHAMBYL REGION. Izdenister natigeler 2024, No. 2 (102), 108-122. https://doi.org/10.37884/2-2024/11.
GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MAPPING OF THE TERRITORY TALAS DISTRICT OF ZHAMBYL REGION. (2024). Izdenister Natigeler, 2 (102), 108-122. https://doi.org/10.37884/2-2024/11
GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MAPPING OF THE TERRITORY TALAS DISTRICT OF ZHAMBYL REGION. Izdenister natigeler, [S. l.], n. 2 (102), p. 108–122, 2024. DOI: 10.37884/2-2024/11. Disponível em: https://kazvetjournal.kaznaru.edu.kz/index.php/research/article/view/498. Acesso em: 15 sep. 2026.
“GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MAPPING OF THE TERRITORY TALAS DISTRICT OF ZHAMBYL REGION”. 2024. Izdenister Natigeler, no. 2 (102) (June): 108-22. https://doi.org/10.37884/2-2024/11.
“GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MAPPING OF THE TERRITORY TALAS DISTRICT OF ZHAMBYL REGION” (2024) Izdenister natigeler, (2 (102), pp. 108–122. doi:10.37884/2-2024/11.
[1]“GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MAPPING OF THE TERRITORY TALAS DISTRICT OF ZHAMBYL REGION”, Izdenister natigeler, no. 2 (102), pp. 108–122, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.37884/2-2024/11.
“GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MAPPING OF THE TERRITORY TALAS DISTRICT OF ZHAMBYL REGION”. Izdenister Natigeler, no. 2 (102), June 2024, pp. 108-22, https://doi.org/10.37884/2-2024/11.
“GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MAPPING OF THE TERRITORY TALAS DISTRICT OF ZHAMBYL REGION”. Izdenister natigeler, no. 2 (102) (June 29, 2024): 108–122. Accessed September 15, 2026. https://kazvetjournal.kaznaru.edu.kz/index.php/research/article/view/498.
1.GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MAPPING OF THE TERRITORY TALAS DISTRICT OF ZHAMBYL REGION. Izdenister natigeler [Internet]. 2024 Jun. 29 [cited 2026 Sep. 15];(2 (102):108-22. Available from: https://kazvetjournal.kaznaru.edu.kz/index.php/research/article/view/498
1.GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MAPPING OF THE TERRITORY TALAS DISTRICT OF ZHAMBYL REGION. Izdenister natigeler. 2024;(2 (102):108-122. doi:10.37884/2-2024/11