Abstract
This article presents an approach to assessing land suitability for irrigated agriculture based on the Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) method using weighted summation. The aim of the study is to integrate various factors affecting the potential of land for irrigation, taking into account their relative importance. The study is focused on the development and testing of a methodology for evaluating the degree of land suitability for irrigated agriculture in the North Kazakhstan Region of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Ten key criteria were identified and quantitatively assessed, including soil, geological parameters, land use, and others. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method was used to determine the weights of the criteria, which made it possible to structure complex decisions based on pairwise comparisons of criteria. The calculation results, presented in the form of a spatial differentiation map, showed zones with different degrees of suitability for irrigated agriculture. The analysis showed that a high degree of suitability is mainly observed in the northwestern part of the region near lakes and along the Ishim River, whereas lands with low suitability prevail in the southern and southeastern parts. The developed methodology makes it possible not only to determine the current potential of land resources but also to take into account factors affecting their sustainability in the long term. This provides a basis for informed decision-making in the field of sustainable agricultural development and planning, as well as for identifying promising areas for the development of irrigated systems.
01 Introduction
The full text of the article is available for download in PDF format on the right panel.
02 References
- [1] Baisholanov, S. S. (2017). Agroclimatic resources of the North Kazakhstan Region: Scientific and applied reference book. Astana. 125 p.
- [2] Suleimenov, M., Saparov, A., Akshalov, K., & Kaskarbayev, Z. (2012). Land degradation issues in Kazakhstan and measures to address them: Research and adoption. Pedologist, 55, 373–381.
- [3] Wang, X., Müller, C., Elliot, J., et al. (2021). Global irrigation contribution to wheat and maize yield. Nature Communications, 12, 1235. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21498-5
- [4] O'Hara, S. L. (1997). Irrigation and land degradation: Implications for agriculture in Turkmenistan, Central Asia. Journal of Arid Environments, 37(1), 165–179.
- [5] Wang, X., Yang, J., Liu, G., Yao, R., & Yu, S. (2015). Impact of irrigation volume and water salinity on winter wheat productivity and soil salinity distribution. Agricultural Water Management, 149, 44–54.
- [6] Leng, G., Huang, M., Tang, Q., & Leung, L. R. (2015). A modeling study of irrigation effects on global surface water and groundwater resources under a changing climate. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 7(3), 1285–1304.
- [7] Akoko, G., Kato, T., & Tu, L. H. (2020). Evaluation of irrigation water resources availability and climate change impacts—A case study of Mwea irrigation scheme, Kenya. Water, 12(9), 2330.
- [8] Worqlul, A. W., Dile, Y. T., Jeong, J., Adimassu, Z., Lefore, N., Gerik, T., ... & Clarke, N. (2019). Effect of climate change on land suitability for surface irrigation and irrigation potential of the shallow groundwater in Ghana. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 157, 110–125.
- [9] Hadelan, L., Jez Rogelj, M., Gugic, J., Crncan, A., & Zrakic, M. (2020). Multi‐criteria evaluation of locations for irrigation system implementation. Irrigation and Drainage, 69(5), 1022–1032.
- [10] Bozdağ, A., Yavuz, F., & Günay, A. S. (2016). AHP and GIS based land suitability analysis for Cihanbeyli (Turkey) County. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75, 1–15.
- [11] Paul, M., Negahban-Azar, M., Shirmohammadi, A., & Montas, H. (2020). Assessment of agricultural land suitability for irrigation with reclaimed water using geospatial multi-criteria decision analysis. Agricultural Water Management, 231, 105987.
- [12] Rihab, R., Gannouni, S., & Rebai, N. (2024). A comparative study of different methods of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) with spatial reference to select suitable sites for treated wastewater of irrigated perimeters. Sustainable Water Resources Management, 10(4), 147.
- [13] ESRI. (2025). Weighted Sum (Spatial Analyst)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation. Retrieved October 7, 2025, from https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/spatial-analyst/weighted-sum.htm
- [14] Saaty, T. L. (1986). Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 32(7), 841–855. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.7.841
- [15] Saaty, T. L. (2004). Decision making—the analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP). Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 13(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-006-0158-y
- [16] Saaty, T. L. (2013). Analytic hierarchy process. In Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science (pp. 52–64). Springer.
- [17] Goepel, K. D. (2018). Implementation of an online software tool for the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP-OS). International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 10(3), 469–487. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v10i3.590
- [18] Teleubay, Z., Yermekov, F., Tokbergenov, I., Toleubekova, Z., Assylkhanova, A., Balgabayev, N., & Kovács, Z. (2023). Identification of potential farm pond sites for spring surface runoff harvesting using an integrated analytical hierarchy process in a GIS environment in Northern Kazakhstan. Water, 15(12), 2258.
- [19] Karthikeyan, R., Venkatesan, K., & Chandrasekar, A. (2019). A comparison of strengths and weaknesses for the Analytical Hierarchy Process. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 9, 12–15.
- [20] Soil-geographical zoning. Scale: 1:5,000,000. (2010). In National Atlas of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Volume 1: Natural Conditions and Resources (p. 150). Almaty.
- [21] FAO&WOCAT. (2023). LDN Kazakhstan Geoportal. Earth Engine App. https://wocatapps.users.earthengine.app/view/kazakhstan-ldn
- [22] Geology. Scale: 1:5,000,000. (2010). National Atlas of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Volume 1: Natural Conditions and Resources (p. 150). Almaty: Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan; Ministry of Environmental Protection of the Republic of Kazakhstan; National Scientific and Technological Holding “Parasat”; Institute of Geography. [In Russian].
- [23] Subsurface flow. Scale: 1:7,500,000. (2010). National Atlas of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Volume 1: Natural Conditions and Resources (p. 150). Almaty: Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan; Ministry of Environmental Protection of the Republic of Kazakhstan; National Scientific and Technological Holding “Parasat”; Institute of Geography. [In Russian].
- [24] Groundwater. Scale: 1:5,000,000. (2010). National Atlas of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Volume 1: Natural Conditions and Resources (p. 150). Almaty: Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan; Ministry of Environmental Protection of the Republic of Kazakhstan; National Scientific and Technological Holding “Parasat”; Institute of Geography. [In Russian].
- [25] NASA. (2025). SRTM Digital Elevation 30m | Earth Engine Data Catalog | Google for Developers. https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/USGS_SRTMGL1_003
- [26] ESRI. (2024). Esri | Sentinel-2 Land Cover Explorer. Living Atlas. https://livingatlas.arcgis.com/landcoverexplorer/