Login | Register
Kazakh National Agrarian Research University ISSN 2304-3334 (Print)  ·  ISSN 2304-3334 (Online)
submit an article
Menu
submit an article
WATER, LAND AND FOREST RESOURCES

ANALYSIS OF THE METHOD OF UPDATING AGRICULTURAL MAPS BY PROCESSING SATELLITE IMAGES AND GEOINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DATA IN THE LAND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Zhazira Zhumatayeva 1 , Dariga Onalbayeva 2 , Zhandos Mukaliyev 1 , Akerke Bekturganova 1 , Akylbek Bekkuliyev 1 , Saken Turganaliev 1

1 Al-Farabi Kazakh National University; 2 Kazakh National Agrarian Research University

doi.org/10.37884/4-2025/36 pp. 342-354 Admitted 01.10.2025 Published 30.12.2025

Abstract

In the context of the digitalization of the agricultural sector, the implementation of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in the processes of monitoring and managing agricultural land is of particular importance. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of GIS tools for solving tasks related to the updating of land use contours, the analysis of agricultural land conditions, and the support of decision-making processes. A comparative analysis of several functional modules and analytical instruments implemented in ArcGIS was carried out. The research employed remote sensing data, vector layers of agricultural land, and cadastral information. The results demonstrated that the use of GIS technologies significantly improves the accuracy of cartographic materials, the efficiency of data updating, and the quality of spatial analysis, which in turn contributes to more effective land resource management. The paper provides recommendations for integrating the most productive tools into land management and cadastral monitoring practices.

geographic information systems agricultural lands land monitoring spatial analysis remote sensing land management resource management

01 Introduction

The full text of the article is available for download in PDF format on the right panel.

02 References

  1. 1. Afroosheh, S., & Askari, M. (2024). Fusion of deep learning and GIS for advanced remote sensing image analysis with enhanced classification accuracy. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.19856.
  2. 2. Bahrami, H., McNairn, H., Mahdianpari, M., & Homayouni, S. (2022). A meta-analysis of remote sensing technologies and methodologies for crop characterization. Remote Sensing, 14, 5633. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14225633.
  3. 3. Diao, C. (2020). Remote sensing phenological monitoring framework to characterize corn and soybean physiological growing stages. Remote Sensing of Environment, 248, 111960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111960.
  4. 4. Garajeh, M. K., et al. (2023). An integrated approach of remote sensing and geospatial modelling for climate-resilient agriculture and food-security assessment. Scientific Reports, 13, 12245. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28244-5.
  5. 5. Gudowicz, J., & Paluszkiewicz, R. (2021). MAT: GIS-based morphometry assessment tools for concave landforms. Remote Sensing, 13, 2810. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13142810.
  6. 6. Helder, D., Markham, B., Morfitt, R., et al. (2018). Observations and recommendations for the calibration of Landsat 8 OLI and Sentinel-2 MSI for improved data interoperability. Remote Sensing, 10, 1340. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10091340.
  7. 7. Huang, Y., Lee, M. A., Thomson, S. J., & Reddy, K. N. (2016). Ground-based hyperspectral remote sensing for weed management in crop production. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 9, 98–109. https://doi.org/10.3965/j.ijabe.20160902.2137.
  8. 8. Inoue, Y. (2020). Satellite- and drone-based remote sensing of crops and soils for smart farming: A review. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 66, 798–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2020.1738899.
  9. 9. Jung, J., Maeda, M., Chang, A., Bhandari, M., Ashapure, A., & Landivar-Bowles, J. (2021). The potential of remote sensing and artificial intelligence as tools to improve the resilience of agriculture production systems. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 70, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2020.09.003.
  10. 10. Kellogg, C. E. (1951). Soil and land classification. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 33(4, Part 1), 499–513. https://doi.org/10.2307/1233560.
  11. 11. Khanal, S., Kushal, K. C., Fulton, J. P., Shearer, S., & Ozkan, E. (2020). Remote sensing in agriculture – Accomplishments, limitations, and opportunities. Remote Sensing, 12, 3783. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12223783.
  12. 12. Klyushnichenko, V. N. (2022). Sovershenstvovanie ispol'zovaniya zemel' sel'skohozyajstvennogo naznacheniya. Vestnik SGUGiT, 27(4), 150–159. https://vestnik.sgugit.ru/upload/vestnik/sborniki/2022/27_4/150-159.pdf.
  13. 13. Maimaitijiang, M., Sagan, V., Sidike, P., Daloye, A. M., Erkbol, H., & Fritschi, F. B. (2020). Crop monitoring using satellite/UAV data fusion and machine learning. Remote Sensing, 12, 1357. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12091357.
  14. 14. Matsushita, B., Yang, W., Chen, J., Onda, Y., & Qiu, G. (2007). Sensitivity of the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) and NDVI to topographic effects: A case study in high-density cypress forest. Sensors, 7, 2636–2651. https://doi.org/10.3390/s7112636.
  15. 15. McCabe, M. F., Houborg, R., & Lucieer, A. (2016). High-resolution sensing for precision agriculture: From Earth-observing satellites to unmanned aerial vehicles. Proceedings of SPIE – Remote Sensing, 9998, 999811. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2241289.
  16. 16. Phang, S. K., Chiang, T. H. A., Happonen, A., & Chang, M. M. L. (2023). From satellite to UAV-based remote sensing: A review on precision agriculture. IEEE Access, 11, 127057–127076. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3330886.
  17. 17. Rafikov, T., Zhumatayeva, Z., Mukaliyev, Z., & Zhildikbayeva, A. (2024). Evaluating land degradation in East Kazakhstan using NDVI and Landsat data. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, 19(5), 1677–1686. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijdne.190521.
  18. 18. Sangeetha, C., Moond, V., Rajesh, G. M., Damor, J. S., Pandey, S. K., & Kumar, P., et al. (2024). Remote sensing and geographic information systems for precision agriculture: A review. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 14(2), 287–309. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i23945.
  19. 19. Sharma, S., Beslity, J. O., Rustad, L., Shelby, L. J., Manos, P. T., Khanal, P., Reinmann, A. B., & Khanal, C. (2024). Remote sensing and GIS in natural resource management: Comparing tools and emphasizing the importance of in-situ data. Remote Sensing, 16(22), 4161. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16224161.
  20. 20. Zhumataeva, Zh., Serikbaeva, G., Turganaliev, S., Mukaliev, Zh., & Rafikov, T. (2024). Increasing the ecological and economic efficiency of land resources use. Izdenister Natigeler, 2(102), 360–369. https://doi.org/10.37884/2-2024/35.

Citation Links

[1]2025. ANALYSIS OF THE METHOD OF UPDATING AGRICULTURAL MAPS BY PROCESSING SATELLITE IMAGES AND GEOINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DATA IN THE LAND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. Izdenister natigeler. 4 (108) (Dec. 2025), 342–354. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37884/4-2025/36.
(1)ANALYSIS OF THE METHOD OF UPDATING AGRICULTURAL MAPS BY PROCESSING SATELLITE IMAGES AND GEOINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DATA IN THE LAND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. Izdenister natigeler 2025, No. 4 (108), 342-354. https://doi.org/10.37884/4-2025/36.
ANALYSIS OF THE METHOD OF UPDATING AGRICULTURAL MAPS BY PROCESSING SATELLITE IMAGES AND GEOINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DATA IN THE LAND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. (2025). Izdenister Natigeler, 4 (108), 342-354. https://doi.org/10.37884/4-2025/36
ANALYSIS OF THE METHOD OF UPDATING AGRICULTURAL MAPS BY PROCESSING SATELLITE IMAGES AND GEOINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DATA IN THE LAND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. Izdenister natigeler, [S. l.], n. 4 (108), p. 342–354, 2025. DOI: 10.37884/4-2025/36. Disponível em: https://kazvetjournal.kaznaru.edu.kz/index.php/research/article/view/1108. Acesso em: 15 sep. 2026.
“ANALYSIS OF THE METHOD OF UPDATING AGRICULTURAL MAPS BY PROCESSING SATELLITE IMAGES AND GEOINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DATA IN THE LAND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM”. 2025. Izdenister Natigeler, no. 4 (108) (December): 342-54. https://doi.org/10.37884/4-2025/36.
“ANALYSIS OF THE METHOD OF UPDATING AGRICULTURAL MAPS BY PROCESSING SATELLITE IMAGES AND GEOINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DATA IN THE LAND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM” (2025) Izdenister natigeler, (4 (108), pp. 342–354. doi:10.37884/4-2025/36.
[1]“ANALYSIS OF THE METHOD OF UPDATING AGRICULTURAL MAPS BY PROCESSING SATELLITE IMAGES AND GEOINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DATA IN THE LAND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM”, Izdenister natigeler, no. 4 (108), pp. 342–354, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.37884/4-2025/36.
“ANALYSIS OF THE METHOD OF UPDATING AGRICULTURAL MAPS BY PROCESSING SATELLITE IMAGES AND GEOINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DATA IN THE LAND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM”. Izdenister Natigeler, no. 4 (108), Dec. 2025, pp. 342-54, https://doi.org/10.37884/4-2025/36.
“ANALYSIS OF THE METHOD OF UPDATING AGRICULTURAL MAPS BY PROCESSING SATELLITE IMAGES AND GEOINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DATA IN THE LAND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM”. Izdenister natigeler, no. 4 (108) (December 30, 2025): 342–354. Accessed September 15, 2026. https://kazvetjournal.kaznaru.edu.kz/index.php/research/article/view/1108.
1.ANALYSIS OF THE METHOD OF UPDATING AGRICULTURAL MAPS BY PROCESSING SATELLITE IMAGES AND GEOINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DATA IN THE LAND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. Izdenister natigeler [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 30 [cited 2026 Sep. 15];(4 (108):342-54. Available from: https://kazvetjournal.kaznaru.edu.kz/index.php/research/article/view/1108
1.ANALYSIS OF THE METHOD OF UPDATING AGRICULTURAL MAPS BY PROCESSING SATELLITE IMAGES AND GEOINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DATA IN THE LAND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. Izdenister natigeler. 2025;(4 (108):342-354. doi:10.37884/4-2025/36